<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1008 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767622</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed a reassessment notice u/s 147 where the revenue sought to disallow sample expenses to doctors as sales promotion. The court held that since these expenses were not disallowed during original assessment proceedings, there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to disallow expenses initially cannot justify reopening after four years. The revenue failed to rebut the assessee&#039;s objection regarding full disclosure, effectively accepting no failure occurred. The reassessment notice was quashed for non-fulfillment of conditions under the first proviso to section 147.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1008 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767622</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed a reassessment notice u/s 147 where the revenue sought to disallow sample expenses to doctors as sales promotion. The court held that since these expenses were not disallowed during original assessment proceedings, there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to disallow expenses initially cannot justify reopening after four years. The revenue failed to rebut the assessee&#039;s objection regarding full disclosure, effectively accepting no failure occurred. The reassessment notice was quashed for non-fulfillment of conditions under the first proviso to section 147.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>