<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1026 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767640</link>
    <description>HC found prima facie merit in petitioner&#039;s challenges to GST notifications. Key issues included: (1) validity of notifications under Section 168A without GST Council recommendation, (2) extension of time for adjudication of Show Cause Notice, and (3) timeliness of Notice issuance. Court granted ad-interim relief, staying the impugned order pending further hearings and respondents&#039; affidavits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1026 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767640</link>
      <description>HC found prima facie merit in petitioner&#039;s challenges to GST notifications. Key issues included: (1) validity of notifications under Section 168A without GST Council recommendation, (2) extension of time for adjudication of Show Cause Notice, and (3) timeliness of Notice issuance. Court granted ad-interim relief, staying the impugned order pending further hearings and respondents&#039; affidavits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>