https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767642 Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, after the Court found continued custody unnecessary on the facts. The petitioner had spent 54 days in judicial custody, the investigating agency had already had sufficient opportunity to interrogate him, and the alleged offences carried imprisonment up to five years. Treating the GST framework as a fiscal revenue measure, the Court held that detention was not required to further the investigation, subject to bail bond, sureties, and restrictions against movement, influence, or interference with the inquiry. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767642 Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, after the Court found continued custody unnecessary on the facts. The petitioner had spent 54 days in judicial custody, the investigating agency had already had sufficient opportunity to interrogate him, and the alleged offences carried imprisonment up to five years. Treating the GST framework as a fiscal revenue measure, the Court held that detention was not required to further the investigation, subject to bail bond, sureties, and restrictions against movement, influence, or interference with the inquiry. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767642