https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767644 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to notifications issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act and a consequential order under Section 73(9), with the petitioner seeking interim protection pending further hearing. The amendment application was allowed, and the challenge was treated as identical to issues already pending in connected writ petitions where rule had been issued and interim relief granted. On that basis, the Court recorded a strong prima facie case for interim relief, issued rule, directed notice to the remaining respondents, and restrained further action pursuant to the impugned order until the petition is heard with the connected matters. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767644 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to notifications issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act and a consequential order under Section 73(9), with the petitioner seeking interim protection pending further hearing. The amendment application was allowed, and the challenge was treated as identical to issues already pending in connected writ petitions where rule had been issued and interim relief granted. On that basis, the Court recorded a strong prima facie case for interim relief, issued rule, directed notice to the remaining respondents, and restrained further action pursuant to the impugned order until the petition is heard with the connected matters. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767644