https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42256 In a serious smuggling case, the Court treated the need for effective investigation as outweighing personal liberty where the material showed seizure of high-value contraband, admissions under the Customs Act, and indications that the real kingpin had not yet been traced; the bail order was therefore cancelled and custody was warranted to avoid hampering the inquiry. On the separate challenge to rearrest, Section 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was construed as allowing discharge on bond, on bail, or by special order of the Magistrate, without resort to ejusdem generis; the objection to continued custody was rejected. The accused were to be taken into custody for a limited period, with further bail or remand left to the Magistrate. en-us Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:10:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42256 In a serious smuggling case, the Court treated the need for effective investigation as outweighing personal liberty where the material showed seizure of high-value contraband, admissions under the Customs Act, and indications that the real kingpin had not yet been traced; the bail order was therefore cancelled and custody was warranted to avoid hampering the inquiry. On the separate challenge to rearrest, Section 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was construed as allowing discharge on bond, on bail, or by special order of the Magistrate, without resort to ejusdem generis; the objection to continued custody was rejected. The accused were to be taken into custody for a limited period, with further bail or remand left to the Magistrate. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42256