<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42253</link>
    <description>The appellate authority had not examined the decisive question whether the seized goods fell within the entry for manufactured zarda and its statutory definition, and the petitioner&#039;s grievance of inadequate opportunity was also accepted. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on that issue, with the remand made conditional on deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within the stipulated time. The appellate authority was also directed to allow inspection of the seized documents and permit copies thereafter, so the petitioner could effectively present his case on reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42253</link>
      <description>The appellate authority had not examined the decisive question whether the seized goods fell within the entry for manufactured zarda and its statutory definition, and the petitioner&#039;s grievance of inadequate opportunity was also accepted. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on that issue, with the remand made conditional on deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within the stipulated time. The appellate authority was also directed to allow inspection of the seized documents and permit copies thereafter, so the petitioner could effectively present his case on reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>