<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1525 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461202</link>
    <description>In penny stock appeals, the HC noted that an identical issue had already been decided in a connected batch of matters, and the parties accepted that the earlier ruling governed the present cases. Applying that binding earlier decision, the Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the revenue and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1525 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461202</link>
      <description>In penny stock appeals, the HC noted that an identical issue had already been decided in a connected batch of matters, and the parties accepted that the earlier ruling governed the present cases. Applying that binding earlier decision, the Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the revenue and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>