https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461193 Management takeover of a textile undertaking does not, without a specific statutory provision, divest the registered proprietor of trade mark rights or automatically transfer those rights to a Custodian. Where no assignment or transmission is registered, use of the proprietor's own registered marks does not support prosecution for trade mark infringement. High Court jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent criminal jurisdiction may be invoked at the investigation stage where a pure legal challenge shows that no offence is disclosed and continuation of proceedings would abuse process. Criminal complaints and consequential proceedings were set aside. en-us Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461193 Management takeover of a textile undertaking does not, without a specific statutory provision, divest the registered proprietor of trade mark rights or automatically transfer those rights to a Custodian. Where no assignment or transmission is registered, use of the proprietor's own registered marks does not support prosecution for trade mark infringement. High Court jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent criminal jurisdiction may be invoked at the investigation stage where a pure legal challenge shows that no offence is disclosed and continuation of proceedings would abuse process. Criminal complaints and consequential proceedings were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461193