https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461192 A petition styled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 227 could not be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision after the petitioner had already exhausted the revisional remedy under Sections 397 and 401. The High Court held that inherent and supervisory powers are available only in exceptional cases to prevent grave injustice, abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice, and found no such circumstance here. The concurrent findings that the respondent lacked sufficient means and that the petitioner was not maintaining her disclosed no illegality or miscarriage of justice. The maintenance order and revisional order were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:45:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461192 A petition styled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 227 could not be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision after the petitioner had already exhausted the revisional remedy under Sections 397 and 401. The High Court held that inherent and supervisory powers are available only in exceptional cases to prevent grave injustice, abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice, and found no such circumstance here. The concurrent findings that the respondent lacked sufficient means and that the petitioner was not maintaining her disclosed no illegality or miscarriage of justice. The maintenance order and revisional order were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461192