<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42238</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the wholesalers did not meet the criteria to be considered related persons under the Central Excises and Salt Act. The petition was allowed, and the duty paid was ordered to be refunded. The petitioners were also awarded costs for the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42238</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the wholesalers did not meet the criteria to be considered related persons under the Central Excises and Salt Act. The petition was allowed, and the duty paid was ordered to be refunded. The petitioners were also awarded costs for the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>