https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767505 A money recovery claim arising from machinery hire was supported by the offer, acceptance, delivery and use of the equipment, together with admissions in evidence; in the absence of any pleaded or documentary proof of breakdown or lawful denial of rent, liability to pay was sustained. Territorial jurisdiction was also found to exist because part of the cause of action arose where the offer originated, acceptance followed, and cheque payments were encashed through the plaintiff's banker. Applying Section 20 CPC, the court treated these connecting facts as sufficient to attract the trial court's jurisdiction and affirmed the decree. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 08:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767505 A money recovery claim arising from machinery hire was supported by the offer, acceptance, delivery and use of the equipment, together with admissions in evidence; in the absence of any pleaded or documentary proof of breakdown or lawful denial of rent, liability to pay was sustained. Territorial jurisdiction was also found to exist because part of the cause of action arose where the offer originated, acceptance followed, and cheque payments were encashed through the plaintiff's banker. Applying Section 20 CPC, the court treated these connecting facts as sufficient to attract the trial court's jurisdiction and affirmed the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767505