https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767508 Conflicting dispute resolution clauses were construed as a whole to determine the law governing the arbitration agreement. Because the contract selected Indian law and jurisdiction in Gujarat, and no express contrary choice was made for the arbitration agreement, the presumption in favour of the lex contractus was not displaced by Bogota as the seat or by Colombian procedural references. On that basis, Indian law governed the arbitration agreement and Indian courts retained supervisory jurisdiction for appointment. The foreign venue did not exclude recourse to Section 11(6), and the tribunal could be constituted accordingly, with the arbitration directed to proceed before a sole arbitrator. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 08:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767508 Conflicting dispute resolution clauses were construed as a whole to determine the law governing the arbitration agreement. Because the contract selected Indian law and jurisdiction in Gujarat, and no express contrary choice was made for the arbitration agreement, the presumption in favour of the lex contractus was not displaced by Bogota as the seat or by Colombian procedural references. On that basis, Indian law governed the arbitration agreement and Indian courts retained supervisory jurisdiction for appointment. The foreign venue did not exclude recourse to Section 11(6), and the tribunal could be constituted accordingly, with the arbitration directed to proceed before a sole arbitrator. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767508