<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42233</link>
    <description>The High Court held that it should not intervene in the classification of imported aluminum slugs under the Customs Tariff Act as there was no settled view within the department. The petitioner was advised to pursue the appeal process rather than seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Regarding the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226, the Court expressed confidence that the Tribunal would consider the prolonged pendency of the petition as sufficient cause for condoning any delay in filing the appeal, allowing the interim orders to remain in force until the Tribunal&#039;s decision on any application for interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 58 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42233</link>
      <description>The High Court held that it should not intervene in the classification of imported aluminum slugs under the Customs Tariff Act as there was no settled view within the department. The petitioner was advised to pursue the appeal process rather than seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Regarding the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226, the Court expressed confidence that the Tribunal would consider the prolonged pendency of the petition as sufficient cause for condoning any delay in filing the appeal, allowing the interim orders to remain in force until the Tribunal&#039;s decision on any application for interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>