<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 910 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767524</link>
    <description>A dispute over handover of maintenance of a corporate debtor&#039;s project during CIRP fell within the Tribunal&#039;s residuary insolvency jurisdiction under section 60(5)(c) because it was connected with the debtor&#039;s assets, operations, and maintenance of the project as a going concern. The maintenance agency could not refuse handover on the ground that the apartment owners&#039; association was not properly registered, as the association was treated as duly registered and the apartment ownership law required transfer of common areas and facilities to it upon formation. Alleged outstanding dues and account reconciliation were not decided in these proceedings and were left to the interim resolution professional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 08:21:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 910 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767524</link>
      <description>A dispute over handover of maintenance of a corporate debtor&#039;s project during CIRP fell within the Tribunal&#039;s residuary insolvency jurisdiction under section 60(5)(c) because it was connected with the debtor&#039;s assets, operations, and maintenance of the project as a going concern. The maintenance agency could not refuse handover on the ground that the apartment owners&#039; association was not properly registered, as the association was treated as duly registered and the apartment ownership law required transfer of common areas and facilities to it upon formation. Alleged outstanding dues and account reconciliation were not decided in these proceedings and were left to the interim resolution professional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>