<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42231</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of a firm manufacturing aluminium circles, granting them total exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 291/86-C.E. The court confirmed the firm&#039;s entitlement to the exemption based on the notification&#039;s language, extending it to the intermediary product in the manufacturing process. Additionally, the rejection of total exemption under Notification No. 43/75 was deemed unjustified, and the court supported the retrospective application of the relevant notification. The court allowed the writ petition, emphasizing the clarity and applicability of the exemption notifications in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42231</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of a firm manufacturing aluminium circles, granting them total exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 291/86-C.E. The court confirmed the firm&#039;s entitlement to the exemption based on the notification&#039;s language, extending it to the intermediary product in the manufacturing process. Additionally, the rejection of total exemption under Notification No. 43/75 was deemed unjustified, and the court supported the retrospective application of the relevant notification. The court allowed the writ petition, emphasizing the clarity and applicability of the exemption notifications in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>