https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42230 Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the Collector's order and the appeal period had not expired, the High Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The availability of the appellate remedy was treated as sufficient ground to refuse interference, and the petitioner was left to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal. The text also notes that an application for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement could be made in the appeal under the excise law. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:51:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42230 Where an efficacious statutory appeal was available against the Collector's order and the appeal period had not expired, the High Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The availability of the appellate remedy was treated as sufficient ground to refuse interference, and the petitioner was left to pursue the appeal before the Tribunal. The text also notes that an application for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement could be made in the appeal under the excise law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42230