<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 939 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767553</link>
    <description>The SC remanded a tax assessment order after finding inadequate notice to the petitioner. The court set aside the original order, requiring the petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed taxes and submit objections within specified timeframes. The judgment emphasized natural justice principles, providing an opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies while ensuring procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 939 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767553</link>
      <description>The SC remanded a tax assessment order after finding inadequate notice to the petitioner. The court set aside the original order, requiring the petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed taxes and submit objections within specified timeframes. The judgment emphasized natural justice principles, providing an opportunity to respond to tax discrepancies while ensuring procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>