https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767555 Detailed show-cause notice and repeated hearing opportunities were provided, including service by post to the address and email furnished by the noticee. The notice contained sufficient particulars to enable a reply, but the petitioner did not respond and remained absent despite multiple notices. In these circumstances, the Court found no basis to exercise writ discretion in favour of the petitioner and declined to interfere on the ground of alleged denial of hearing or defective service. The impugned proceedings were left undisturbed and the writ application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767555 Detailed show-cause notice and repeated hearing opportunities were provided, including service by post to the address and email furnished by the noticee. The notice contained sufficient particulars to enable a reply, but the petitioner did not respond and remained absent despite multiple notices. In these circumstances, the Court found no basis to exercise writ discretion in favour of the petitioner and declined to interfere on the ground of alleged denial of hearing or defective service. The impugned proceedings were left undisturbed and the writ application was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767555