https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461174 An order stated to have been passed on consent was recalled because the alleged consent of the DPSC was not shown to have been given in writing or otherwise validly communicated. The court noted the inconsistent stance taken on authorisation and the absence of timely disclosure that formal approval had not been granted. As the earlier order had proceeded on the basis of consent and no valid written consent or withdrawal of consent was established, its foundation was unsustainable. The review and connected applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461174 An order stated to have been passed on consent was recalled because the alleged consent of the DPSC was not shown to have been given in writing or otherwise validly communicated. The court noted the inconsistent stance taken on authorisation and the absence of timely disclosure that formal approval had not been granted. As the earlier order had proceeded on the basis of consent and no valid written consent or withdrawal of consent was established, its foundation was unsustainable. The review and connected applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461174