https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461184 The appeal was disposed of after the parties accepted that the controversy had to be reconsidered in light of the Supreme Court's binding ratio. The earlier order was not finally examined on merits; instead, the matter was remitted to the competent authority for fresh decision in accordance with the later Supreme Court ruling. The operative effect is that the issue must now be decided afresh under the governing precedent. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461184 The appeal was disposed of after the parties accepted that the controversy had to be reconsidered in light of the Supreme Court's binding ratio. The earlier order was not finally examined on merits; instead, the matter was remitted to the competent authority for fresh decision in accordance with the later Supreme Court ruling. The operative effect is that the issue must now be decided afresh under the governing precedent. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461184