https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42222 Where an effective statutory appeal is available against confiscation and penalty orders, a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained, and the existence of a pre-deposit requirement does not by itself justify bypassing the appellate remedy. The Court therefore upheld relegation of the petitioner to the statutory appeal. On the challenge to the notification, the Court found no substance in the allegation of arbitrariness because the material placed before it showed discernible parameters guiding the committee's discretion, rather than unguided power. The argument that an amended notification applied at the relevant time was left for the appellate forum. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:36:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42222 Where an effective statutory appeal is available against confiscation and penalty orders, a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained, and the existence of a pre-deposit requirement does not by itself justify bypassing the appellate remedy. The Court therefore upheld relegation of the petitioner to the statutory appeal. On the challenge to the notification, the Court found no substance in the allegation of arbitrariness because the material placed before it showed discernible parameters guiding the committee's discretion, rather than unguided power. The argument that an amended notification applied at the relevant time was left for the appellate forum. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42222