<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42216</link>
    <description>Notification No. 119/75 was construed to cover goods manufactured in a factory on a job-work basis where the job worker carries out a manufacturing process on customer-supplied materials and returns the finished article. The explanation to the notification was read as extending beyond mere processing units, and the exemption was linked to the value added by the job work. A departmental view treating the notification as confined only to units doing simple processing was held inconsistent with its terms, so the contrary demand could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42216</link>
      <description>Notification No. 119/75 was construed to cover goods manufactured in a factory on a job-work basis where the job worker carries out a manufacturing process on customer-supplied materials and returns the finished article. The explanation to the notification was read as extending beyond mere processing units, and the exemption was linked to the value added by the job work. A departmental view treating the notification as confined only to units doing simple processing was held inconsistent with its terms, so the contrary demand could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>