<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42209</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing that the duty recovery was without jurisdiction and, therefore, not subject to the time limitation prescribed under the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment highlighted the importance of authority in tax collection and the obligation to refund erroneously levied amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 112 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42209</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, emphasizing that the duty recovery was without jurisdiction and, therefore, not subject to the time limitation prescribed under the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment highlighted the importance of authority in tax collection and the obligation to refund erroneously levied amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>