<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agricultural Produce Market Cess Collection Ruled Unconstitutional After GST Implementation Under CGST and AGST Acts 2017</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86647</link>
    <description>The HC ruled that collection of cess by respondent authorities under the Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 post-GST implementation was unconstitutional and ultra vires to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and AGST Act, 2017. Following the precedent established in M/s. Bhatter Traders, which involved pari materia issues, the Court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. The judgment effectively invalidates the respondent authorities&#039; power to levy and collect such cess in the GST regime, rendering their actions unlawful and establishing grounds for the petitioner&#039;s refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Agricultural Produce Market Cess Collection Ruled Unconstitutional After GST Implementation Under CGST and AGST Acts 2017</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86647</link>
      <description>The HC ruled that collection of cess by respondent authorities under the Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 post-GST implementation was unconstitutional and ultra vires to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and AGST Act, 2017. Following the precedent established in M/s. Bhatter Traders, which involved pari materia issues, the Court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. The judgment effectively invalidates the respondent authorities&#039; power to levy and collect such cess in the GST regime, rendering their actions unlawful and establishing grounds for the petitioner&#039;s refund claim.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>