<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dishonor of Post-Dated Cheque: Partnership Firm Must Be Named Party Before Partners Can Face Section 138 Liability</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86616</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed an application concerning dishonor of a post-dated cheque under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The Court held that the proceedings were fatally flawed because the partnership firm (Kishan Construction) was not made a party to the complaint, with only one partner (respondent Kishan Bouri) named as accused. Following precedents in Sarad Kumar Sanghi and Aneeta Hada, the Court emphasized that when a company/firm commits an offense under Section 138, the entity itself must be arraigned as a party before vicarious liability can attach to its partners/directors under Section 141. This defect was deemed incurable as no statutory notice was served on the firm within the prescribed 30-day period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dishonor of Post-Dated Cheque: Partnership Firm Must Be Named Party Before Partners Can Face Section 138 Liability</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86616</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed an application concerning dishonor of a post-dated cheque under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The Court held that the proceedings were fatally flawed because the partnership firm (Kishan Construction) was not made a party to the complaint, with only one partner (respondent Kishan Bouri) named as accused. Following precedents in Sarad Kumar Sanghi and Aneeta Hada, the Court emphasized that when a company/firm commits an offense under Section 138, the entity itself must be arraigned as a party before vicarious liability can attach to its partners/directors under Section 141. This defect was deemed incurable as no statutory notice was served on the firm within the prescribed 30-day period.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>