<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 861 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767475</link>
    <description>HC dismissed appellant&#039;s appeal regarding compensation for seized betel nuts. Customs authorities admitted goods valued at Rs.88 lakhs at seizure but destroyed them after one and half years claiming unfitness for consumption. Court held Customs failed to discharge onus of proving deterioration occurred naturally rather than due to their custody negligence. Respondent should have been given opportunity to be present during testing or obtain second opinion before destruction. Customs authorities directed to pay compensation within four weeks for failing to provide satisfactory explanation for goods&#039; deterioration while in their custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 861 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767475</link>
      <description>HC dismissed appellant&#039;s appeal regarding compensation for seized betel nuts. Customs authorities admitted goods valued at Rs.88 lakhs at seizure but destroyed them after one and half years claiming unfitness for consumption. Court held Customs failed to discharge onus of proving deterioration occurred naturally rather than due to their custody negligence. Respondent should have been given opportunity to be present during testing or obtain second opinion before destruction. Customs authorities directed to pay compensation within four weeks for failing to provide satisfactory explanation for goods&#039; deterioration while in their custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>