<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 878 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767492</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law, as the concurrent findings showed no evidence of illegal mining activities by the assessee. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of expenditure disallowance under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as no penalties for statutory violations were claimed as expenses. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on reports, including the Central Empowered Committee&#039;s opinion, supported that mining without environmental clearances did not constitute illegal mining. The Court concluded there was no legal error or perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 878 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767492</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law, as the concurrent findings showed no evidence of illegal mining activities by the assessee. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of expenditure disallowance under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as no penalties for statutory violations were claimed as expenses. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on reports, including the Central Empowered Committee&#039;s opinion, supported that mining without environmental clearances did not constitute illegal mining. The Court concluded there was no legal error or perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>