<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767495</link>
    <description>Accommodation entry business receipts in disclosed and undisclosed bank accounts were treated as unexplained credits because the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the creditors or beneficiaries. The High Court held that a bare claim that deposits belonged to customers did not discharge the burden under Section 68, and the assessee could not avoid that provision by saying no books were maintained where computer data, CDs, accounts, profit and loss statement and tax audit material constituted books of account. The Tribunal&#039;s blanket reduction of the addition to commission income at 0.15% was not sustained for all deposits, though that rate was accepted only for identified beneficiaries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767495</link>
      <description>Accommodation entry business receipts in disclosed and undisclosed bank accounts were treated as unexplained credits because the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the creditors or beneficiaries. The High Court held that a bare claim that deposits belonged to customers did not discharge the burden under Section 68, and the assessee could not avoid that provision by saying no books were maintained where computer data, CDs, accounts, profit and loss statement and tax audit material constituted books of account. The Tribunal&#039;s blanket reduction of the addition to commission income at 0.15% was not sustained for all deposits, though that rate was accepted only for identified beneficiaries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>