<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42197</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal should ordinarily be condoned where there is no culpable negligence, deliberate default, or mala fide intention, because limitation rules must be applied liberally so that substantial justice is not defeated by technicalities. Applying that principle, the Court found the Tribunal had taken an unduly technical approach in refusing to condone delay and dismissing the appeal on limitation. The refusal to condone was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to admit the appeal and decide it on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42197</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal should ordinarily be condoned where there is no culpable negligence, deliberate default, or mala fide intention, because limitation rules must be applied liberally so that substantial justice is not defeated by technicalities. Applying that principle, the Court found the Tribunal had taken an unduly technical approach in refusing to condone delay and dismissing the appeal on limitation. The refusal to condone was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to admit the appeal and decide it on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>