https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461154 Relief under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC was available only on a clear admission sufficient to justify relief on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC; because title to the suit property remained in dispute and no such admission existed, the requested interim deposit or security could not be ordered. A second application for the same relief was also barred by finality and res judicata, since an earlier similar application had been dismissed, not challenged, and no fresh facts or material change in circumstances were shown. The application was therefore rejected with costs. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:01:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461154 Relief under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC was available only on a clear admission sufficient to justify relief on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC; because title to the suit property remained in dispute and no such admission existed, the requested interim deposit or security could not be ordered. A second application for the same relief was also barred by finality and res judicata, since an earlier similar application had been dismissed, not challenged, and no fresh facts or material change in circumstances were shown. The application was therefore rejected with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461154