<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42194</link>
    <description>Immediate mandamus for excise duty refund was declined because the assessable value had not yet been redetermined after the appellate remand under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As the refundable amount, if any, had not been ascertained and the departmental appeal before the Tribunal remained pending, the dispute was still sub judice. In the absence of material showing undue delay, no further direction for expeditious disposal was warranted, and the request for refund-related mandamus failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42194</link>
      <description>Immediate mandamus for excise duty refund was declined because the assessable value had not yet been redetermined after the appellate remand under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As the refundable amount, if any, had not been ascertained and the departmental appeal before the Tribunal remained pending, the dispute was still sub judice. In the absence of material showing undue delay, no further direction for expeditious disposal was warranted, and the request for refund-related mandamus failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>