<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1565 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461167</link>
    <description>The SC ruled that the petitioner cannot challenge GST deductions from RA bills as the 2019 contract explicitly allowed tax deductions at source. The court directed the parties to resolve payment disputes through arbitration, emphasizing the primacy of contractual terms over previous understandings. The judgment upheld the respondent&#039;s right to deduct 18% GST from submitted bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1565 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461167</link>
      <description>The SC ruled that the petitioner cannot challenge GST deductions from RA bills as the 2019 contract explicitly allowed tax deductions at source. The court directed the parties to resolve payment disputes through arbitration, emphasizing the primacy of contractual terms over previous understandings. The judgment upheld the respondent&#039;s right to deduct 18% GST from submitted bills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>