https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42193 The High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal without requiring a cash deposit or bank guarantee, considering the financial hardship faced by the appellant in meeting the deposit requirements imposed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the deposit conditions based on the petitioner's financial status, emphasizing the need to prevent undue hardship. The writ petitions were disposed of, with each party bearing their own costs, concluding the legal dispute over the penalty and deposit obligations. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:05:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42193 The High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal without requiring a cash deposit or bank guarantee, considering the financial hardship faced by the appellant in meeting the deposit requirements imposed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the deposit conditions based on the petitioner's financial status, emphasizing the need to prevent undue hardship. The writ petitions were disposed of, with each party bearing their own costs, concluding the legal dispute over the penalty and deposit obligations. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42193