https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42188 At the stage of framing charge, the court need only see whether the record discloses a ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence; it does not assess truth, admissibility, or final evidentiary value. Applying that standard, the High Court noted that the Magistrate had before him investigation evidence and documents relating to the alleged export of heroin concealed as canned goods, and held that these materials constituted a prima facie basis for charge. Objections based on unproved prosecution documents, section 108 Customs statements, and section 78(6) of the Evidence Act were left for trial. The quashing petition under section 482 failed. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42188 At the stage of framing charge, the court need only see whether the record discloses a ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence; it does not assess truth, admissibility, or final evidentiary value. Applying that standard, the High Court noted that the Magistrate had before him investigation evidence and documents relating to the alleged export of heroin concealed as canned goods, and held that these materials constituted a prima facie basis for charge. Objections based on unproved prosecution documents, section 108 Customs statements, and section 78(6) of the Evidence Act were left for trial. The quashing petition under section 482 failed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42188