<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 829 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767443</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that penalty under Section 43 of the Black Money Act for failure to disclose foreign assets should be deleted. The assessee made no fresh investments during the assessment year, only continuing previous investments. Since the explanation for source of investment was accepted and there was no malafide intent to evade the Act, the non-disclosure constituted a bonafide mistake rather than willful violation. The penalty was deleted following precedents from Ocean Diving and Mylan Laboratories cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 829 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767443</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that penalty under Section 43 of the Black Money Act for failure to disclose foreign assets should be deleted. The assessee made no fresh investments during the assessment year, only continuing previous investments. Since the explanation for source of investment was accepted and there was no malafide intent to evade the Act, the non-disclosure constituted a bonafide mistake rather than willful violation. The penalty was deleted following precedents from Ocean Diving and Mylan Laboratories cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>