<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 783 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767397</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval for tea garden corporate debtor. Court held appellant lacked locus standi as only stakeholders with direct interest in CIRP can challenge resolution plans. Successful resolution applicant (SRA) permitted to pursue lease renewals as successor to corporate debtor, but adjudicating authority expressed no opinion on renewal merits, which remains within state government&#039;s domain. Court clarified SRA&#039;s right limited to pursuing renewal applications without prejudicing state&#039;s decision-making authority over lease grants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 783 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767397</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appeal challenging resolution plan approval for tea garden corporate debtor. Court held appellant lacked locus standi as only stakeholders with direct interest in CIRP can challenge resolution plans. Successful resolution applicant (SRA) permitted to pursue lease renewals as successor to corporate debtor, but adjudicating authority expressed no opinion on renewal merits, which remains within state government&#039;s domain. Court clarified SRA&#039;s right limited to pursuing renewal applications without prejudicing state&#039;s decision-making authority over lease grants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>