https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767398 Electricity-related fuel surcharge and special fuel surcharge were treated as statutory dues under the tariff framework, with liability arising on issuance of bills rather than merely on prior consumption or regulatory quantification. On that basis, the approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not extinguish the disputed charges as pre-insolvency claims, and recovery remained permissible under the billing cycle and tariff orders. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was also held not to displace the Electricity Act in the absence of a real inconsistency, so the two statutes were capable of harmonious construction and the regulatory recovery mechanism continued to apply. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767398 Electricity-related fuel surcharge and special fuel surcharge were treated as statutory dues under the tariff framework, with liability arising on issuance of bills rather than merely on prior consumption or regulatory quantification. On that basis, the approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not extinguish the disputed charges as pre-insolvency claims, and recovery remained permissible under the billing cycle and tariff orders. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was also held not to displace the Electricity Act in the absence of a real inconsistency, so the two statutes were capable of harmonious construction and the regulatory recovery mechanism continued to apply. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767398