<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767399</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC enforced a foreign arbitral award directing payment of EUR 5.5 million from the judgment debtor to the decree holder. The court rejected objections based on alleged FEMA violations (RBI had granted post facto approval) and claims of double recovery from both German liquidator and Indian entity. The HC found the judgment debtor&#039;s objections were made in bad faith, as they had full knowledge of prior settlements when entering the consent award. The court noted the settlement agreement contained comprehensive waivers and confirmed no double benefit would result. The judgment debtor was ordered to deposit the award amount (approximately Rs. 52 crores) with the court registry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767399</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC enforced a foreign arbitral award directing payment of EUR 5.5 million from the judgment debtor to the decree holder. The court rejected objections based on alleged FEMA violations (RBI had granted post facto approval) and claims of double recovery from both German liquidator and Indian entity. The HC found the judgment debtor&#039;s objections were made in bad faith, as they had full knowledge of prior settlements when entering the consent award. The court noted the settlement agreement contained comprehensive waivers and confirmed no double benefit would result. The judgment debtor was ordered to deposit the award amount (approximately Rs. 52 crores) with the court registry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>