<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 788 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767402</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that appellants are not liable to pay Social Welfare Surcharge when Basic Customs Duty is exempted under notifications 24/2015-Cus and 25/2015-Cus dated 08.04.2015 issued under MEIS and SEIS schemes. The tribunal followed its earlier decision holding that SWS is payable at 10% on BCD, but where BCD is nil, SWS shall also be computed as nil. The impugned order was set aside and appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 788 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767402</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that appellants are not liable to pay Social Welfare Surcharge when Basic Customs Duty is exempted under notifications 24/2015-Cus and 25/2015-Cus dated 08.04.2015 issued under MEIS and SEIS schemes. The tribunal followed its earlier decision holding that SWS is payable at 10% on BCD, but where BCD is nil, SWS shall also be computed as nil. The impugned order was set aside and appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>