<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 795 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767409</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee in Black Money Act proceedings regarding alleged beneficial ownership of undisclosed foreign assets. The AO relied solely on uncertified bank documents received through DTAA information exchange without verifying authenticity. The assessee denied under oath any connection to the foreign bank accounts. The tribunal held that uncertified foreign bank statements without proper certification under the Banker&#039;s Book Evidence Act 1891 were inadmissible as evidence. The revenue failed to corroborate the unauthenticated documents with other evidence to establish beneficial ownership. The appellate order was set aside, finding no undisclosed foreign assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 795 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767409</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee in Black Money Act proceedings regarding alleged beneficial ownership of undisclosed foreign assets. The AO relied solely on uncertified bank documents received through DTAA information exchange without verifying authenticity. The assessee denied under oath any connection to the foreign bank accounts. The tribunal held that uncertified foreign bank statements without proper certification under the Banker&#039;s Book Evidence Act 1891 were inadmissible as evidence. The revenue failed to corroborate the unauthenticated documents with other evidence to establish beneficial ownership. The appellate order was set aside, finding no undisclosed foreign assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>