<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 801 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767415</link>
    <description>Addition relating to concessional sugar sales could not be sustained on an incomplete factual record because the authorities had not properly examined the basis for the concessional quantity, the applicable rate, the number of beneficiaries, customary practice in the cooperative sugar industry, and the effect of State directions issued under section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Tribunal noted that the earlier remand directions and the circular dated 01.03.2006 required proper verification of these foundational facts. The deletion of the addition was therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 801 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767415</link>
      <description>Addition relating to concessional sugar sales could not be sustained on an incomplete factual record because the authorities had not properly examined the basis for the concessional quantity, the applicable rate, the number of beneficiaries, customary practice in the cooperative sugar industry, and the effect of State directions issued under section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Tribunal noted that the earlier remand directions and the circular dated 01.03.2006 required proper verification of these foundational facts. The deletion of the addition was therefore set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>