https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461151 In a case before the Delhi HC, the petitioner requested the provisional release of 53 kg of gold seized on 22.12.2020. The court issued a notice, and the respondent's counsel agreed that the Competent Authority would decide on the matter within four weeks. The HC disposed of the writ petition, instructing the Appropriate Authority to address the request according to the law within the specified time. The court did not assess the merits of the parties' arguments, maintaining all rights and contentions. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:34:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461151 In a case before the Delhi HC, the petitioner requested the provisional release of 53 kg of gold seized on 22.12.2020. The court issued a notice, and the respondent's counsel agreed that the Competent Authority would decide on the matter within four weeks. The HC disposed of the writ petition, instructing the Appropriate Authority to address the request according to the law within the specified time. The court did not assess the merits of the parties' arguments, maintaining all rights and contentions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461151