<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT, OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42167</link>
    <description>Fabricating and mounting bus or truck bodies on chassis supplied by customers does not amount to manufacture of complete motor vehicles in common parlance or functional classification. The activity remains manufacture of bodies of motor vehicles classifiable under Heading 87.07, not motor vehicles under Headings 87.02 or 87.04. Because the goods fall outside the motor-vehicle entries covered by the exemption carve-out, the units are not liable to excise duty on motor vehicles and do not require a licence as manufacturers of motor vehicles. The distinction between bodies built separately and bodies mounted on supplied chassis was rejected as immaterial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 52 - HIGH COURT, OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42167</link>
      <description>Fabricating and mounting bus or truck bodies on chassis supplied by customers does not amount to manufacture of complete motor vehicles in common parlance or functional classification. The activity remains manufacture of bodies of motor vehicles classifiable under Heading 87.07, not motor vehicles under Headings 87.02 or 87.04. Because the goods fall outside the motor-vehicle entries covered by the exemption carve-out, the units are not liable to excise duty on motor vehicles and do not require a licence as manufacturers of motor vehicles. The distinction between bodies built separately and bodies mounted on supplied chassis was rejected as immaterial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>