https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461137 The Bench considered whether an unappealed finding on title and the character of temple property in a connected suit operated as res judicata in a related appeal, and whether a finding in one jointly tried suit could be altered without an appeal from that suit. One view treated the earlier finding as binding because the issue had been directly and substantially in issue; the opposing view held that the finding was unnecessary to the injunction suit and therefore not conclusive. No majority opinion was reached on either question, and the matter was directed to be placed before another Bench. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:51:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461137 The Bench considered whether an unappealed finding on title and the character of temple property in a connected suit operated as res judicata in a related appeal, and whether a finding in one jointly tried suit could be altered without an appeal from that suit. One view treated the earlier finding as binding because the issue had been directly and substantially in issue; the opposing view held that the finding was unnecessary to the injunction suit and therefore not conclusive. No majority opinion was reached on either question, and the matter was directed to be placed before another Bench. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461137