<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 737 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767351</link>
    <description>A charitable hospital&#039;s supply of medicines to inpatients, with only cost recovery, was treated as an inseparable part of medical care and not as independent business under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, because the statutory definitions of &quot;business&quot; and &quot;dealer&quot; required carrying on a business of buying, selling or supplying goods. The same composite-service reasoning applied to the hospital canteen for attendants: it was incidental to the hospital&#039;s charitable function and did not create dealer status or taxable business activity. On that basis, the tax orders and consequential proceedings were set aside, and the hospital activities in question were held outside the taxing net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:41:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 737 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767351</link>
      <description>A charitable hospital&#039;s supply of medicines to inpatients, with only cost recovery, was treated as an inseparable part of medical care and not as independent business under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, because the statutory definitions of &quot;business&quot; and &quot;dealer&quot; required carrying on a business of buying, selling or supplying goods. The same composite-service reasoning applied to the hospital canteen for attendants: it was incidental to the hospital&#039;s charitable function and did not create dealer status or taxable business activity. On that basis, the tax orders and consequential proceedings were set aside, and the hospital activities in question were held outside the taxing net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>