<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42138</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the argument for automatic license renewal, emphasizing the authority&#039;s discretionary power to grant or refuse renewal based on relevant factors. As the licenses had expired, the cancellation challenge became moot. The court directed the respondents to process the renewal application with an open mind, allowing the petitioners a hearing if renewal is refused. The petitioners were permitted to continue business for goods removal during the renewal process. The court highlighted the need for a conscious and reasoned approach in license renewal decisions, emphasizing the discretionary nature of the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42138</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the argument for automatic license renewal, emphasizing the authority&#039;s discretionary power to grant or refuse renewal based on relevant factors. As the licenses had expired, the cancellation challenge became moot. The court directed the respondents to process the renewal application with an open mind, allowing the petitioners a hearing if renewal is refused. The petitioners were permitted to continue business for goods removal during the renewal process. The court highlighted the need for a conscious and reasoned approach in license renewal decisions, emphasizing the discretionary nature of the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>