<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767375</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue appeals concerning additions for suppressed sales and inflated commission expenditure. The CIT(A) had deleted additions for alleged suppression of sales based on differences between ticket sales per books and other parameters. ITAT held that electronic sales receipts cannot be received in separate bank accounts, IATA data was never provided to assessee, and ADM represents expenses not income. The AO relied solely on appraisal reports without independent investigation or providing computation methods. Regarding commission disallowance, ITAT found no evidence of bogus payments to related parties, noting commission rates vary based on volume and are company&#039;s prerogative if genuine. The AO failed to justify arm&#039;s length rates of 10% or provide basis for excessive commission determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 07:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767375</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue appeals concerning additions for suppressed sales and inflated commission expenditure. The CIT(A) had deleted additions for alleged suppression of sales based on differences between ticket sales per books and other parameters. ITAT held that electronic sales receipts cannot be received in separate bank accounts, IATA data was never provided to assessee, and ADM represents expenses not income. The AO relied solely on appraisal reports without independent investigation or providing computation methods. Regarding commission disallowance, ITAT found no evidence of bogus payments to related parties, noting commission rates vary based on volume and are company&#039;s prerogative if genuine. The AO failed to justify arm&#039;s length rates of 10% or provide basis for excessive commission determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>