<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1607 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461129</link>
    <description>After the amendment to Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitral tribunal may grant interim protection to secure a monetary claim, including by directing that funds be maintained in bank accounts, where a prima facie case is shown so the eventual award is not rendered ineffective. The tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by the appellant&#039;s bank transactions and financial disclosures, and its view on the material was found to be plausible. In appeal under Section 37, interference is limited to cases where the tribunal&#039;s order is perverse or contrary to law; a mere possibility of another view is insufficient. The interim security order was therefore not disturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1607 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461129</link>
      <description>After the amendment to Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitral tribunal may grant interim protection to secure a monetary claim, including by directing that funds be maintained in bank accounts, where a prima facie case is shown so the eventual award is not rendered ineffective. The tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by the appellant&#039;s bank transactions and financial disclosures, and its view on the material was found to be plausible. In appeal under Section 37, interference is limited to cases where the tribunal&#039;s order is perverse or contrary to law; a mere possibility of another view is insufficient. The interim security order was therefore not disturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>