https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461133 Section 37(2)(b) permits only limited appellate interference with an arbitrator's discretionary interim order under Section 17, particularly where the order is neither arbitrary nor perverse. Refusal to secure disputed counter-claims was upheld because the claims remained uncrystallized, and the request for security rested mainly on the respondent's alleged weak financial position. Financial hardship alone was held insufficient to convert an unsecured, indeterminate claim into a secured one. The reasoning aligned with the restrained use of extraordinary protective relief and the principles governing attachment before judgment, so no ground for appellate interference was found. en-us Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:18:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461133 Section 37(2)(b) permits only limited appellate interference with an arbitrator's discretionary interim order under Section 17, particularly where the order is neither arbitrary nor perverse. Refusal to secure disputed counter-claims was upheld because the claims remained uncrystallized, and the request for security rested mainly on the respondent's alleged weak financial position. Financial hardship alone was held insufficient to convert an unsecured, indeterminate claim into a secured one. The reasoning aligned with the restrained use of extraordinary protective relief and the principles governing attachment before judgment, so no ground for appellate interference was found. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461133