<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1259 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461122</link>
    <description>An interim attachment made absolute without addressing the challenge to the agreement, disputed liability, or other objections was held unsustainable because an order affecting substantive rights must give reasons. The court set aside the non-speaking order. As arbitral proceedings had already commenced, it also preserved a brief interim restraint while leaving the parties liberty to seek further interim measures before the arbitral tribunal under the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=806522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1259 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461122</link>
      <description>An interim attachment made absolute without addressing the challenge to the agreement, disputed liability, or other objections was held unsustainable because an order affecting substantive rights must give reasons. The court set aside the non-speaking order. As arbitral proceedings had already commenced, it also preserved a brief interim restraint while leaving the parties liberty to seek further interim measures before the arbitral tribunal under the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>